Home - NatureMapr Australia

Announcements

5 May 2025

Hello NatureMaprsAs we move into the cooler months and sighting counts begin to wind down our team has been working tirelessly to ensure our platform’s usability and performance. All merch has been po...

Improvements to data import tool (coming soon)

NatureMapr welcomes Edgar McNamara

Platform wide attribute changes

New Feature: Moderator Quick Responses!

Discussion

KimberiRP wrote:

2 hrs ago

I agree it's not Neotartessus flavipes.
Protartessus nynganensis is a possibility - see https://idtools.dpi.nsw.gov.au/keys/leafhop/species/pnynganensis.htm - but I haven't found any images of the live insect.

Neotartessus flavipes

WendyEM wrote:

Yesterday

"STICHTOCHILA gen. n. ..... Antennae a little more than two-thirds the length of fore wings (0.70-0.72x), ciliations near base in male 2.5-4.3x diameter of flagellum, diminishing in length to about three-fourths, flagellum in female ventrally unscaled, scape with strong pecten." Mon. of Aust. Lep. Vol. 3 Common, I.F.B. CSIRO 1994 p. 135

Stictochila (genus)

dcnicholls wrote:

Yesterday

I’m inclined to think this may be a B. Minus. May need to wait until it gets a bit bigger.

Blechnum wattsii

ibaird wrote:

Yesterday

Yes, agree it superfciaslly looked like a Ctamdid species but the palps are clearly Oeciporidae family. I see your point,
but I'm not sure I could call 4668791 P. agnesella though,

Philobota agnesella

ibaird wrote:

Yesterday

Moth damaged, missing half of one forewing. Possibly P. orescoa but black collar at the thorax not clearly prominent as one mighr expect.

Philobota group